Managed Security

Threat Hunting Services in Pakistan

Hypothesis-driven hunts surfacing threats that evade automated tooling.

Request This Service All Services

What it is

Hunting assumes the alert never fired. Rather than waiting for a detection, we form hypotheses about how an attacker would operate in your environment and go looking for the evidence — the persistence, the beacon, the credential reuse that has been sitting in your logs unqueried.

Types of Threat Hunting we deliver

Hypothesis-driven hunts

Starting from a specific question, such as whether a known technique is being used in your environment, and proving it either way.

Compromise assessment

A point-in-time answer to the question "are we already breached", which is the usual reason this gets commissioned.

Threat-informed hunting

Hunts built around the actors and techniques that actually target your sector, rather than a generic list.

Detection gap analysis

Each hunt that finds something tells you a detection was missing. We turn those into rules so the same thing alerts next time.

Retainer hunting

Regular scheduled hunts, because a single hunt is a snapshot and the value compounds with repetition.

How we do it

  1. 1

    Hypothesis development

    We start from specific, testable propositions grounded in ATT&CK techniques relevant to your sector and stack.

  2. 2

    Data sufficiency check

    Whether your telemetry could evidence the hypothesis at all — a gap here is itself a finding worth having.

  3. 3

    Hunting execution

    Queries across endpoint, network, identity and cloud telemetry looking for the technique rather than a signature.

  4. 4

    Anomaly investigation

    Each lead run down to a conclusion: benign, misconfiguration, or genuinely malicious.

  5. 5

    Detection handoff

    Anything found becomes a permanent detection rule so the same technique alerts automatically next time.

  6. 6

    Coverage reporting

    Which techniques were hunted, what was found, and where telemetry gaps blocked the hunt.

What's included

  • Hypothesis-led hunting, not alert review
  • ATT&CK technique coverage per hunt cycle
  • Endpoint, network, identity and cloud telemetry
  • Telemetry gap identification
  • New detections written from what is found
  • Documented hunt outcomes either way

Who needs it

  • Organisations with monitoring in place wanting assurance it is sufficient
  • Teams with reason to suspect undetected activity
  • Businesses in sectors under active targeting

Deliverables

  • Hunt report per hypothesis, including negative results
  • New detection rules ready to deploy
  • Telemetry gap analysis
  • ATT&CK coverage heat map

What Threat Hunting costs

Priced per hunt cycle, or as a recurring block of hunting days.

The figure depends on scope, so we quote one fixed price in writing before any work begins. These are the things that move it:

  • Estate size — Hunting means querying across the whole environment and reading the results. More endpoints means more to search and more benign oddities to rule out.
  • The quality of the telemetry you already collect — Hunting needs process, command-line, network and authentication data. Where that is missing, the first cycle is partly about getting it, which is useful work but is not hunting.
  • How many hypotheses per cycle — Each hunt is a specific question — credential theft, persistence, lateral movement. The number of questions is the number of hunts.
  • Whether it is one-off or continuous — A single hunt answers "is anything here now". A recurring programme is the one that changes outcomes, and is priced as a programme.
  • Whether findings are handed over or acted on — Hunting that ends in a handover is cheaper than hunting that ends in containment, and far less useful if something is found.

One cycle on your highest-value segment is a sound first purchase. It also tells you honestly whether your logging can support hunting at all.

Where we deliver Threat Hunting

Hunting is done against your telemetry, so it runs remotely for organisations anywhere in Pakistan and internationally. Where data residency rules mean logs cannot leave the country, we design the engagement around that rather than treating it as an obstacle.

Further reading

Compliance relevance

NIST CSFISO 27001SOC 2

Frequently asked questions

That is a legitimate and useful result, provided the telemetry was sufficient to have found something. The report says which techniques were genuinely ruled out and which could not be, and the second list is often the more valuable one.
A SOC responds to what the tooling raises. Hunting deliberately looks for what the tooling would not raise. They are complementary, and the hunt usually improves the SOC by producing new detections.
Quarterly cycles work for most organisations, with additional hunts triggered by relevant threat intelligence or a suspicious event.
Actively searching your environment for attacker activity that your detections did not alert on. It starts from a hypothesis rather than an alert, which is the whole point: the things that matter most are usually the things nothing fired on.
A SOC is reactive by design, triaging what the tooling raises. Hunting assumes the tooling missed something and goes looking. A mature programme needs both, and the output of hunting is new detections, which makes the SOC better over time.
Telemetry: endpoint data, authentication and directory logs, network or proxy records, and cloud audit logs where relevant. The quality and retention of that data sets the ceiling on what any hunt can find, and we will tell you honestly if it is too thin to be worth running.
Quarterly for most organisations, monthly for those with a high threat profile or heavy regulation. One hunt tells you about one moment; the programme is where the value is.
Usually not. We prefer to work with the telemetry you already collect. Where visibility is genuinely missing in a critical area we will say so and propose the smallest change that closes the gap, rather than a platform rollout.
Priced per hunt cycle, or as a recurring block of hunting days. Beyond that the figure depends on scope — mainly estate size, the quality of the telemetry you already collect and how many hypotheses per cycle. We quote one fixed price in writing before any work begins, so the number does not move once the engagement starts. One cycle on your highest-value segment is a sound first purchase. It also tells you honestly whether your logging can support hunting at all.
Based in Houston or Texas?

See how we deliver 24/7 SOC monitoring and security assessments for Houston-area organizations.

Houston services
New to managed detection?

Our guide covers how SOC, MSSP, MDR and SIEM actually differ, build vs buy, and the metrics that matter.

Read the guide

Related services

Incident Response

Rapid containment, eradication, and recovery led by senior responders.

Learn More

SOC Services

24/7 monitoring, detection, and response from our managed SOC.

Learn More

Threat Intelligence

Actionable, contextual intelligence mapped to your threat model.

Learn More