API Security Testing
REST, GraphQL, and gRPC testing for broken auth, BOLA, and data exposure.
Learn More
Offensive Security
Bug Bounty Program Management in Pakistan
Design and triage of private and public bug-bounty programs.
What it is
Help designing, launching and running a bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure programme that produces real findings without burying your team. We write the policy, set the scope and rewards, and take on the triage so your engineers only see reports that are valid, deduplicated and clearly explained.
Types of Bug Bounty Programs we deliver
Private bug bounty programs
A small invited group of vetted researchers. Almost every organisation should start here rather than opening to the world.
Public bug bounty programs
Open to all researchers, once your triage capacity and your fix pipeline can genuinely absorb the volume.
Vulnerability disclosure policy
The free starting point: a published, lawful route for anyone who finds a flaw to tell you, which every organisation with an internet presence should have.
Triage as a service
We receive, validate, deduplicate and rate submissions, so your engineers only ever see confirmed, reproducible findings.
Program design and reward structuring
Scope, rules, safe harbour and reward tiers, set so the programme attracts the right work and stays affordable.
Researcher communication
Managing the relationship, because the reputational damage from a badly handled disclosure usually exceeds the bug.
How we do it
-
1
Readiness assessment
Whether you are ready at all — a bounty launched before basic testing is done buys expensive reports of things you already knew.
-
2
Policy and safe harbour
Scope, rules of engagement and legal safe harbour written so good-faith researchers are protected and know where the boundaries are.
-
3
Reward structure
Bounty tiers benchmarked against your sector so the programme attracts attention without unbounded cost.
-
4
Launch approach
Usually private with invited researchers first, widening to public once triage throughput is proven.
-
5
Triage operation
We validate, reproduce, deduplicate and severity-rate every submission before it reaches your developers.
-
6
Researcher relations
Timely responses and fair adjudication, because a programme's reputation determines who bothers to submit to it.
What's included
- Programme policy and safe harbour language
- Scope and reward structure design
- Platform selection and setup support
- Full triage and reproduction of submissions
- Deduplication and severity rating
- Researcher communication handled for you
Who needs it
- Organisations with mature internal testing ready for external eyes
- Products with a large public attack surface
- Teams needing a disclosure route before a regulator requires one
Deliverables
- Published programme policy and scope
- Triaged, validated findings into your tracker
- Duplicate and out-of-scope decisions with reasoning
- Programme metrics — volume, validity rate, time to resolve
What Bug Bounty Programs costs
Priced as a management retainer, separate from the rewards you pay researchers.
The figure depends on scope, so we quote one fixed price in writing before any work begins. These are the things that move it:
- How much inbound volume you expect — The cost here is triage, not testing. A public programme on a well-known brand produces far more noise than a private one with twenty invited researchers.
- Public or private — A private programme is controllable and predictable. A public one finds more and demands a real intake process behind it.
- How much of the triage we handle — Validating, reproducing, deduplicating and rating submissions before your developers see them is the work. Where that line sits is the main variable in the retainer.
- Your reward budget — Paid separately to researchers and set by you. We advise on a scale that attracts real submissions without an open-ended liability.
- Whether a safe-harbour policy already exists — Programmes without clear legal terms attract disputes. Drafting that once is a one-off cost worth paying before launch.
Run a private programme first. It is cheaper, quieter, and it shows you whether your remediation pipeline can keep up before the whole internet is invited.
Where we deliver Bug Bounty Programs
Programme management is delivered remotely, and the researcher community you are inviting is global by definition. What is local is the money: we help structure reward tiers that make sense against Pakistani budgets rather than copying a table that would exhaust your programme in a month.
Compliance relevance
Frequently asked questions
Only if you can fix what comes in. If you have not had a penetration test, or you have a backlog of known unfixed issues, a bounty will mostly cost money to be told things you already know. We will say so before you spend.
Bounty payments plus triage effort plus platform fees if you use one. The controllable part is scope and reward design, which is most of what the design work is for.
A vulnerability disclosure programme gives researchers a lawful way to report and pays nothing. A bounty pays for findings and attracts far more attention. Most organisations should run a VDP first.
Only after a penetration test, and only if you can fix things quickly. A bounty finds what remains after the obvious issues are gone. Launching one over an untested application means paying researchers to report findings a single test would have given you more cheaply, and then being unable to fix them fast enough.
A VDP is a published, lawful way for someone to report a flaw. It costs nothing and every organisation with an internet presence should have one. A bounty adds payment, which increases both the volume and the quality of what arrives, along with the obligation to triage and pay promptly.
Set reward tiers by severity and cap the programme, so your exposure is known in advance. In this market a private programme with modest tiers often attracts good researchers, because reputation and a clean disclosure record matter to them alongside money. Start small: you can always raise rewards, but lowering them damages the programme.
Usually this happens because they were ignored, not because they are hostile. Published rules with a disclosure timeline and safe harbour, and responses that actually arrive, prevent nearly all of it. Where it does happen we handle the communication, and the first rule is that silence makes it worse.
A public programme over a broad scope certainly can be, and a large share of submissions are duplicates, out of scope or not genuine findings. That is the argument for a private programme and for triage as a service: your engineers should only ever see confirmed, reproducible, deduplicated issues.
No, and treating it as one is the common mistake. A test gives you guaranteed coverage of an agreed scope to a deadline, which is what an auditor or a client will ask for. A bounty gives you continuous, unpredictable attention from many people. They complement each other; neither substitutes.
Related services
Penetration Testing
Manual, OSCP-grade testing that emulates real attackers against your assets.
Learn MoreWeb Application Pentesting
OWASP-aligned assessments uncovering logic flaws, injection, and auth bypasses.
Learn More